WCAG Accessibility Audit & Compliance Support

If your website or web app needs to meet accessibility expectations, a structured WCAG audit is the fastest way to identify what’s broken, what’s high‑risk, and what to fix first.

This page helps you request an accessibility audit and get routed to a suitable provider based on your stack, size, and goals—without personal branding or vendor hype.

You’ll receive:

  • A prioritized list of WCAG issues with evidence (screenshots, code references where applicable)
  • Severity and effort estimates to support planning
  • Clear fix guidance your developer can implement
  • Optional re‑test to confirm fixes

CTA: Request an audit quote
Secondary CTA: Ask a quick question

Name

Who this is for

This service fits teams that need practical, documented accessibility outcomes:

  • SaaS & B2B sites (marketing pages + app UI)
  • E‑commerce (catalog, product pages, cart/checkout)
  • Agencies delivering accessible builds for clients
  • Organizations with compliance pressure (education, healthcare, finance)
  • Teams preparing for procurement that require accessibility documentation

If you’re not sure what you need (audit vs remediation vs documentation), you can submit a short intake and we’ll route you correctly.

What you get (deliverables)

A typical audit output includes:

1) Findings report (WCAG‑mapped)

  • Issues mapped to WCAG success criteria (e.g., contrast, keyboard access, form labels)
  • Clear reproduction steps so problems are not “opinion‑based”
  • Notes on user impact (especially for keyboard‑only and screen reader users)

2) Prioritized issue log (dev‑ready)

  • Severity and priority scoring (what to fix first)
  • Page/template references (so you don’t fix the same thing 100 times)
  • Suggested remediation patterns

3) Fix guidance (implementation‑oriented)

  • Practical recommendations that work with common stacks (WordPress, React, etc.)
  • Where helpful, example HTML/ARIA patterns (kept minimal and specific)

4) Optional verification (re‑test)

  • Confirmation that fixes actually resolved the issue
  • Updated issue status for tracking and closure

Optional (only if requested and supported by the matched provider):

  • Accessibility statement support
  • VPAT / ACR assistance (more common for enterprise/procurement contexts)

How the audit is performed

Good accessibility reviews are not purely automated.

Most providers we route to use a hybrid method:

  • Automated scanning for common errors (useful, but incomplete)
  • Manual checks for keyboard access, focus order, forms, and dynamic UI
  • Assistive technology sampling (e.g., screen reader behavior, zoom/reflow)

Audits are typically aligned to WCAG 2.2 (and may reference WCAG 2.1 depending on your requirements). Most compliance targets focus on Level AA.

What an audit usually covers

  • Navigation and keyboard flow
  • Headings/structure and readable semantics
  • Color contrast and non‑color cues
  • Forms, errors, and validation messaging
  • Images/icons and text alternatives
  • Modals, menus, and interactive components
  • Responsive behavior: zoom, reflow, tap targets (where relevant)

What an audit usually does not cover by default

  • Native mobile apps (unless scoped explicitly)
  • Third‑party tools you cannot control (some widgets, embedded experiences)
  • Full user testing with participants (separate engagement)

Scope options (choose what fits)

Below are common engagement shapes. Exact scope depends on templates, flows, and complexity.

Option A: Quick Scan (small site)

Best for small marketing sites and early risk checks.

Typical scope

  • Key pages (homepage, core service/product pages, contact/lead form)
  • High‑impact issues + quick wins
  • Clear “next steps” for a full audit if needed

Option B: Standard Audit (most common)

Best for sites with multiple templates and important user flows.

Typical scope

  • Core templates + top journeys (lead gen, sign‑up, checkout, etc.)
  • WCAG‑mapped issue log with priority scoring
  • Implementation guidance

Option C: Ongoing Program (governance)

Best for teams shipping frequently or operating at scale.

Typical scope

  • Recurring reviews (monthly/quarterly)
  • Regression prevention (design/dev checklists)
  • Re‑tests and release support

Typical timeline

Timelines vary by size and complexity, but common ranges are:

  • Quick Scan: ~3‑7 business days
  • Standard Audit: ~1‑3 weeks
  • Ongoing Program: monthly/quarterly cadence

If you have a deadline (procurement, release, complaint response), include it in the intake.

Pricing (indicative ranges)

Accessibility audit pricing depends mainly on templates, flows, and complexity (not just number of pages).

Indicative ranges:

  • Quick Scan: usually lower‑cost, limited pages/templates
  • Standard Audit: mid‑range, templates + flows
  • Program: recurring retainer‑style

Factors that change cost

  • Number of unique templates and states (logged‑in vs logged‑out)
  • Web app complexity (dynamic components, heavy JS)
  • E‑commerce flows (cart/checkout, account management)
  • Accessibility documentation requirements (VPAT/ACR)
  • Need for re‑testing and verification cycles

If you want firm numbers, submit the intake and you’ll get a scoped quote.

How lead routing works (vendor‑agnostic)

This site is not a personal consultancy. The process is simple:

1) You submit requirements (site type, stack, scope, deadline)
2) We match you with a provider that fits your needs
3) You receive an introduction email and can proceed directly

We prioritize providers that are responsive, technical, and clear about scope. If we can’t match you confidently, we’ll tell you rather than forcing a bad fit.

Request an accessibility audit (intake)

Use the intake below to get a scoped response.

Required details

  • Website/app URL
  • Business type (SaaS, e‑commerce, agency, etc.)
  • Platform/stack (WordPress, Shopify, custom React, etc.)
  • What you need: Quick Scan / Standard Audit / Ongoing Program / Not sure
  • Key user flows (lead form, sign‑up, checkout, etc.)
  • Deadline (if any)
  • Contact email

Helpful (optional)

  • Analytics: top pages / conversions
  • Any known complaints or legal concerns (high level only)
  • Third‑party tools used (chat widget, booking, embedded forms)

CTA: Request an audit quote

FAQ

What is WCAG, and which version matters?

WCAG is a set of accessibility guidelines for web content. Many teams align to WCAG 2.1 or 2.2, most commonly Level AA.

Is an automated scan enough?

No. Automated tools catch some issues, but they miss keyboard traps, focus order problems, and many screen reader failures. A hybrid approach is standard.

Do you fix issues, or only audit?

We route requests based on what you need. Many providers can do audit + remediation support, but implementation is typically separate from the audit deliverable.

What pages do you test?

Usually templates and flows, not every single URL. Fixing templates addresses many pages at once.

Can you audit a web app (not just a marketing site)?

Yes, but it must be scoped around screens, states, and flows. Web apps often require more manual coverage.

Do you provide an accessibility statement?

Some providers do, depending on audit results and your needs. It can be included as an add‑on.

Can you help with VPAT / ACR?

If you need procurement documentation, note it in the intake. We can route to providers who support VPAT/ACR work.

What if we use third‑party widgets?

Third‑party elements can be assessed, but you may be limited in what you can fix. Some providers will recommend alternatives or mitigation options.

How quickly can we start?

Start dates depend on provider availability and scope. Include your deadline; urgent scopes may be possible.

Do you guarantee legal compliance?

No one should promise that. The practical goal is to identify issues, prioritize fixes, and document improvements aligned to WCAG.

Ready to move forward?

If you want a scoped audit quote and a clear plan of action, submit the intake.

CTA: Request an audit quote
Secondary CTA: Ask a quick question